2013-07-17, 00:40
raol
Ursprungligen postat av Depprikula
Nä det var inte maskinfel. Mekanikerna som hade klargjort planet som startade precis före hade lagt upp ett rullblock ovanpå landningsställuckan. När detta plan startade så trillade rullblocket ner på rullbanan.
Concorden som startade efteråt körde på detta rullblock och landningsstället skadades.

rullblock = de man trycker in under hjulen för att planet inte ska rulla

Hm, har inte hört talas om att ett rullblock var inblandat.
Det var väl en metallbit som lossnade från ett tidigare plan, däcket körde över detta, exploderade och slog sönder en bränsletank.

Five minutes before the Concorde, a Continental Airlines DC-10 departing for Newark, New Jersey, had lost a titanium alloy strip, 435 millimetres (17.1 in) long and about 29 to 34 millimetres (1.1 to 1.3 in) wide, during takeoff from the same runway. French authorities acknowledged that a required runway inspection was not completed after the Continental takeoff, as was protocol for Concorde-takeoff preparation.[8]
During the Concorde's subsequent take-off run this piece of debris, still lying on the runway, cut a tyre, rupturing it. A large chunk of tyre debris (4.5 kilograms or 9.9 pounds) struck the underside of the aircraft's wing at an estimated speed of 140 metres per second (310 mph).[note 1] Although it did not directly puncture any of the fuel tanks, it sent out a pressure shockwave that ruptured the number five fuel tank at the weakest point, just above the undercarriage.

After reaching take-off speed, the tyre of the number 2 wheel was cut by a metal strip lying on the runway, which came from the thrust reverser cowl door of the number 3 engine of a Continental Airlines DC-10 that had taken off from the runway several minutes before. This strip, installed in Houston, Texas, had been neither manufactured nor installed in accordance with the procedures as defined by the manufacturer.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concorde_crash